Would the Zetas like to comment on an informative movie called An Inconvenient Truth? It appears the film is hinting at future flooding under the guise of global warming when in truth the cause are effects of the pole shift. [and from another] Would the Zetas care to comment about Al Gores statement that we have only ten years to stop Global Warming?
Al
Gore is certainly aware of the pending pole shift, and the effect Planet X
is having on the Earth. As a Vice President under Clinton, he was an
automatic member of MJ12, and would have learned this from that source if
he was not already cognizant. So why then is he purporting that the Earth
changes are due to Global Warming? Gore is in a unique position, poised to
return to the Presidency which he was denied. We have stated that
he is the de facto Commander in Chief
of the US Military, in their eyes. The US Military is not alone in
considering him the only legitimate President, since 2000. The vote fraud
in 2004 has continued that situation, with Gore the last person
legitimately elected to be President of the United States, by challenging
his loss of position. Kerry lost this status in the eyes of those backing
Gore when he capitulated, readily, and did not even challenge his loss in
Ohio.
The US government has been posed at the brink of a rebellion, to take back
the government from those who took it by fraud in both 2000 and 2004. What
is restraining this coup, this return to legitimacy, is the bulk of
Congress who are slavishly obedient to Bush and the vote fraud machine,
and the packed Supreme Court. Lately the Supreme Court has become an
unknown, with two new Bush appointees, but the assumption is that they
would align with Bush in any constitutional crisis. Vote fraud was assumed
for the future. GOP members of Congress could not miss the promise
electronic voting fraud had of delivering Karl Rove's dream, GOP control
forever. Thus intimidated, they followed the dictates coming from the
White House. Vote fraud has lately been exposed, pulled into mainstream
media attention by the Puppet Master, who is steadfastly
decapitating the Bush Administration from any influence over the
affairs of the world. GOP control of Congress thus can no longer be
assured, and in view of the polls must be assumed to be lost.
Thus the time when the US public can be fully informed - about the stolen
2000 election, the fraudulent 2004 election, the cover-up over 911, the
use of the US Military to gain control of the Middle East oil fields, and
many other crimes - is close at hand.
What does this mean for Al Gore? Gore has kept himself in the public eye,
coming forth for well publicized lectures on the need to protect the
Constitution, and has retained his following among those who deem him the
legitimate President. For a public announcement that Bush is illegitimate
and Gore to replace him in the White House, there is more than the
following among those in government required. The hearts and minds of the
public must be ready to accept the bad news that the White House
has been home to a group of criminals by embracing the good news
that someone they respect and are familiar with, in fact elected in 2000
by popular vote, is going to set this right. Thus, the current press to be
the spokesperson for Global Warming has as its real agenda to put Gore
into the public view, in a favorable way. How can he lose, in this current
campaign? Global Warming has been the prime excuse for the Earth changes
caused by Planet X, which by general agreement cannot yet be announced to
the public. Can Bush counter the Gore argument by pointing to Planet X?
Bush has shown contempt for the changes that a Global Warming excuse would
require. He refuses to comply with the Kyōto Agreement, insisting that the
US as the greatest consumer of carbon fuels in the world can continue on
this splurge, unabated. He gives lip service only to alternative energy
sources, while backing big oil companies all the way.
Meanwhile the fury and frequency of storms pounding the US is on the
increase. Bush, already low in the polls because of the conduct of the War
in Iraq and the loss of jobs in the US, will now have the finger pointed
at him on yet another issue. He is the cause of the storms
pounding the US, indirectly, by not taking action on Global Warming
issues. One sees on one hand the compassionate and concerned Gore,
detailing the steps that should be taken, and on the other hand
the arrogant and detached Bush, dismissive of any action required and with
his Katrina response standing in stark contrast to Gore. This is a clever
approach on Gore's part, which Bush cannot win. He cannot point to Planet
X. He cannot, given the expectations of his backers and cronies, suddenly
decide that big oil companies need to change their ways. He has pushed the
US into a debt position so there is no room for funding of alternative
fuels unless he backs out of Iraq or changes his position on tax cuts for
the rich. He is trapped, and thus can be assumed to stand in place, rigid,
while Gore captures the hearts of those increasingly affected by the
weather changes. Disasters in the US, sure to come as the Earth changes
increase, will likewise focus anger on the Bush Administration for their
cuts in social services. When the time comes to overturn those who have
stolen the White House, there will be no contest in where the affections
of the public lie. No need to go to the polls. Gore wins this
vote, too.